Bowling, Breaststroke or Barry Cryer?
Lots of old family sayings came to mind this morning as I browsed Twitter. “You could have knocked me down with a feather”. “Well, I’ll go the foot of our stairs”. “I never believe a word that Audrey Brush says. Take a look behind her net curtains and she’s nothing like the woman you see in Platts”.
In fact, that last catchphrase is probably the most apposite for this post. Today, Mencap have launched a new survey to find out why people with learning disabilities don’t go out in the evenings. This is what they say on survey monkey:
“Mencap is interested to hear your thoughts on why people with a learning disability may struggle to have a full and active social life. We would like to hear your thoughts on why this is and how this could be improved”.
This is a week after the CQC found one Mencap’s own residential homes as “inadequate” and amongst its findings was that the four residents hardly left the premises as between 7am and 10pm, only two support staff were employed. As all the residents need 2:1 support when going out, it doesn’t need a statistical genius to see that those residents aren’t going anywhere. Looking at the CQC reports of other Mencap care homes, this staffing ratio seems to be the norm. One of the residents at the “inadequate” home loves bowling but is never allowed to go because the staff aren’t available to go with him.
So it might be a case of putting your own house in order before you launch a national survey. What’s the betting that in a couple of months time when the results are in and collated, Harold & Hilda will call on the government to address this shocking level of understaffing that leads people with LD to lead such impoverished lives. In service provision land, it is not encouraged to take a peek behind Audrey Brush’s curtains.
I’ve written before that we go to the fabulous local Mencap pool twice a week. It is run by a magnificent team of volunteers. In the 12 years we’ve been going there, it is very very rare to see people from care homes attend the pool accompanied by their paid carers. It is ironic that none of the three Mencap care homes in the borough are able to avail themselves of this great Mencap resource because they won’t employ enough staff to enable their residents to go there.
I guess the results of the survey will be pretty obvious. “Yes. We would love to go out more but the home I live in doesn’t have enough staff to support me to get out to places”. I don’t think for one minute this is just down to Mencap care homes. I suspect it’s endemic across the care home sector.
I wonder what spin will be put on the survey outcome to disguise the reality. They might try and do what the ATU did with Steven back in 2010. I got three tickets to go and see Barry Cryer at the Ruislip Comedy Bunker. I thought Steven might enjoy it because Mr Cryer often turns up in dictionary corner in Countdown. Needless to say the bunker was risk assessed and deemed too high a risk to accommodate Steven on a night out. I went with a mate and Steven was prevented hearing Barry’s joke about the perils of eating swan. But, you get my point. In the same way that “clinical reasons” are given for not moving people out of ATUs, the reason for people not going out gets shifted on to the “problem” person. It really is quite shameful.
This isn’t the post I was going to write today. But the post I was going to write, coincidentally fits it with the Mencap survey. I wonder if the cost of going out can also prohibit people in care homes. Yesterday we went to one of our local council run swimming pools. Steven has a leisure card and me and the other carer were allowed on for nothing. £1.80 for a good hours entertainment. However, not all places are as enlightened about carers. I remember the theme park in Great Yarmouth last year and I ended up paying £100 just to get in for Steven, me and the 2 carers. No concessions at all. And when there aren’t any concessions, the person ends up having to pay for their carers as well. Most people with learning disabilities are having sizeable chunks of their income taken under the Fairer Charging Policy, so they are not left with an awful lot to take up memberships or have nights out. If we’re talking equality then the person should pay for their gym membership (for example) out of their own income rather than have it included in their personal budget but if the gym charges a daily rate for casual users then paying for the carers you need to support you there starts to tot up and for many becomes unaffordable.
I don’t want to do Mencap’s work for them. I don’t want to give them a get out clause for their woeful staffing levels. Because at the end of the day, you may have the money to go out but if there are only two staff in your care home, you ain’t going anywhere. Except to sit on your sofa and listen to Barry Cryer on Radio 4.
From → Social Care