Skip to content

Endless Endlessness

I’m humming an old tune again today. I’m sorry.

The social worker phoned me yesterday to announce that he needs to send both the Community DoLS paperwork and the latest care plan back to me as he’s had to amend one section on each and needs mine and the support workers’ signatures again. Let’s remember that they started the Community DoLS process in May 2015 and it hasn’t got to within farting distance of the court yet. The latest care plan was reviewed in April this year and still hasn’t been signed off.

The care plan hold up is because I wrote something on the last copy I signed and sent back. I took offense to the sentence, “Steven is unable to make friendships” and wrote on the form, “This is incorrect. Steven has his own definition of friendship and has many friends”. I’m glad I corrected this framing of who he is but it means the whole 12 page form has to be redone and resubmitted.

The latest hold up to the DoLS is just plain bonkers. The social worker was checking the section on Steven’s contact numbers and came across a number he didn’t recognise. It turned out it was the landline of the home we left in 2009. But he can’t tippex it out. The whole 16 page application needs to be redone and come back for me and Des and Alan to sign. Three and a half years and four social workers after the DoLS assessment started.

Two things:

I’ve written many times over the past three years that I couldn’t give a monkeys about the Community DoLS. It is a pointless exercise that says nothing and has no bearing on our life at all. I’ve tried to engage with it as little as possible. I’ve changed my tune the past few weeks. Since my health issues, I’ve worked overtime to try and secure Steven’s future after my death as best as I can. The DoLS form states several times that it is in Steven’s best interests to be living in his own home with 24 hour support. It’s the least restrictive option for his care. I agree. But I want the court to rubber stamp that. I don’t trust Hillingdon to suddenly change their mind the day after I die. I want a belt and braces approach to Steven’s future.

The second thing is the glaring reminder of the nonsense of social care and how it ties ties itself up in ridiculous knots. I have two forms sitting in front of me. The care plan describes the 24 hour support as a positive thing. It enables Steven to live a good life. This is right. However, the DoLS form sees this in a very different light and sees the 24 support as depriving Steven of his liberty. How crazy is it that one document acknowledges it gives Steven his liberty and yet the other document written by the same person determines it deprived him of his liberty?

I think the whole system lacks capacity.

Advertisements

Human Consultations

Three things. Bear with me as I try to knit them together.

I got some sort of news from the hospital today. Needless to say, I had to phone them; they didn’t phone me. Today seemed a good day to chase them up as it was a fortnight ago today that the secretary promised to “escalate” my scan results. They outsource all their out patient scans to a private company so that generated another layer of bureaucratic non action. Anyway, the results are in. Liver is okay. No sign of gall stones. But “something is showing up” in my bladder. I had to go for more blood tests this afternoon. The consultants will have their meeting next Tuesday when my case will be discussed. I’ll then be notified of “the plan”. Probably, if I chase them up. My bladder may be showing up something but this whole process is showing up something too. I’m not a human being. I’m reference number P901263. It’s life and death to me. It’s a job to everyone else. The piece of paper I took to the blood department revealed nothing human about me beyond my name. The nurse commented on my “lovely veins”. That’s what I am. Can it realistically be anything else?

Today the government issued their response to the LEDER review into the premature deaths of people with autism and/or learning disabilities. Here is the link: (Don’t worry if you nod off halfway through).

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-learning-disabilities-mortality-review-leder-programme-2nd-annual-report

It’s pretty underwhelming. More consultations. More dates, two years ahead, for the next stage of the process to happen. Talk of considering mandatory training for all staff in NHS. Mencap being given airtime to puff their plumage. They’ve been lauding the training proposal all over social media today presumably with one eye on a juicy contract to provide that training. The voice of the lucrative learning disability industry. I was invited on to a radio programme this afternoon to discuss the government’s announcement. I couldn’t do it. I couldn’t be involved in another discussion of “complex needs” or “this difficult client group”. I couldn’t say the same thing I’m always saying (Don’t worry. I see the irony of that sentence. I’m forever saying the same fucking thing in this blog). The review can’t achieve anything unless it finds a way to see the people it’s serving as human beings. And as important as death reviews are, they have to give regard to the peoples’ lives. Normal, messy, adventurous human lives.

But can it realistically be anything else than more consultations, more plans, more action groups, more pledges, more transformation?

I’m in demand at the moment. I’ve been asked to write a piece about the government’s proposed Liberty Protection Scheme. I haven’t said yes or no yet but I don’t think I’ve got anything new to say. DoLS have become a huge part of the Lucrative Learning Disabilities Industry and I don’t see the new LPS changing that. Reading the proposals, it’s hard to see that they’re about human beings. The bureaucracy is woven into the proposals and that well and truly trumps the human. I can’t debate the proposals on social media because for me it’s not an academic discourse. It’s not about a system, good or bad. It’s about Steven going swimming. I’m scared about “necessary and proportionate” replacing “best interests” because that further dehumanises an already non human group. The bottom line is that I cannot find a space within the debate to talk about human beings living normal lives.

But can it realistically be any different?

I’ve done it. I’ve been there too.  40 years ago I worked for the DHSS. When I worked on the reception desk, I saw the human. When I visited people in their own homes, I saw a human. But when I was sitting at my desk assessing a new claim, I mechanically processed the form that said: “SP. UE. 2Ds. CT. SICB. PA”. I didn’t even register her name. She was just claimant 19634.

It could be different.

It’s less than two weeks until the start of the online Rightful Lives exhibition. Despite the early criticism thrown at the exhibition, I’m amazed at how collaborative the project has turned out to be. Equal contributions from disabled and non disabled people, sitting next to each other in the conference display cases. No fanfares. No patronising differentiations. Just an exciting mish mash of people stepping up to the plate. I want to know what the visitors to the exhibition think and feel. I want to lock the doors until they’ve written their essays about how the exhibition will inform them. I know that’s ridiculously arrogant but I’m not bothered. I want to ask people, “When you look at the exhibits from Jack Moore, or Mikey Brown, what do you see?” Of course the exhibition won’t change the world. It’s just an unusual invitation to be a guest in the lives of some people who don’t normally get guests.  I’d just like it to prompt visitors to remember something about a human they’ve just seen.

Trouble is, you can’t go on a radio programme or write a journal piece where your take home message is “Just see the fucking human being”. It ain’t sexy enough. An anecdote about Steven’s relationship with Sybil Fawlty or a story about my hospital (non) adventure is good for a blog but it doesn’t cut the mustard in a wider audience. I don’t speak the Mencap language. And because of that, the door is wide open for more focus groups consulting to their hearts content, with a vague promise that something may bear fruit in 2021.

The World According To Brian The Snail

I used to play a silly game in my head. I haven’t done it for years for obvious reasons. A song would come on the radio. Perhaps Going Underground. I would go, “Ooh that’s 18 years since that was released”. I’d splash around in the nostalgia of 18 years ago for a few seconds. Then I would try and imagine what my life would be like 18 years hence. It was a playful distraction. I can’t do it anymore. I’m not going to hear Karma Chameleon and go “Ooh that’s 35 years since that was released” and then imagine 35 years into the future when I’ll be 94.

Time has become both all important but meaningless to me at the moment. I’m stuck in a place where it is very important to me but completely irrelevant to my outside world. Three examples:

I’m still waiting for the results of the CT scan. Nothing has happened unless I chase it up. I’m now rationing my phone calls. I can’t phone everyday: it’s too time and energy consuming. Six weeks of nothing much.

After my first visit to the GP, I decided, to use an old fashioned phrase, to tend to my affairs. One of the most important things seemed to me to get my bank accounts changed to joint accounts with my sister. That way, if I am dying, Steven’s shopping will still get done and the support workers will still be paid. Three and a half weeks, and three visits to the bank and it still isn’t sorted. In all, I’ve probably spent six hours on the phone to the Nationwide call centre. This week, I was told there had been a “glitch” with the “identity processing” so back to the branch we went. They don’t do anything in branch anymore, it’s just a physical call centre, so I’m still relying on someone, behind the scenes somewhere to pull their finger out.

And finally, I received a letter that revealed after 3 years and 4 months, the Community DoLS application still hasn’t been submitted to court. Steven’s had 4 social workers in that time. I couldn’t give a monkeys about the Community DoLS but it is demanded that I engage with it. The council don’t issue stamp addressed envelopes anymore so I had to hand deliver it to the civic centre. You are forced to engage or else you become the problematic parent.

Yesterday I was following the live tweeting of NHS Ability’s launch of their 10 year #LTPconversations. I’m not sure what LTP stands for – someone suggested Long Term Plan. I have an awful fear it stands for Listening To People. Whatever it means, this is the NHS’s latest blast of hot air to make people with autism and/or learning disabilities one of their top priorities over the next 10 years. And to be the ball rolling, they are holding several LTP conversations with a range of stakeholders. It was very depressing reading. As Julie Newcombe pointed out, as Transforming Care whimpers out in March 2019, is LTP what is replacing it? And 10 years seems an awfully long time. I can’t remember what was number one in the hit parade 10 years ago.

One person’s life is another person’s job. It’s stupid to expect an employee at NHS Ability to see any sense of urgency. I hope I’m not sounding self entitled but I would like someone at the gastroenterology unit to recognise I’m experiencing physical pain and the mental pain of not knowing is pretty tricky to manage too. I suspect my expectations are too high. Why should a call centre operator, following a script, have the first clue about showing a bit of empathy? Again, I’m hoisted by my own silly expectations.

Fast forwarding 35 years on, Boy George will probably be pushing up the daisies. I’ll have fallen off my perch. And from what we know from the Leder report, Steven will probably be discussing Countdown in heaven with Freddie Mercury and Dusty Springfield. But I’ll bet my last Toffo, that in 35 years time, there’ll be the latest NHS think-tank/concordat/Bubble breakfast club starting a new conversation about something we’ve had all the answers to for many years.

I can’t promise that Steven’s Community DoLS will have the stamp of the court in 35 years time though. Can you be assessed for capacity when you’re dead?

Above My Station

This morning I read a lovely piece by Ermintrude, reflecting on her ambition and her relationship with leadership. Like all her writing, it’s straightforward, honest and full of humility. And like all good writing, it’s had me preoccupied all morning reflecting on where I stand on the themes the piece raises.

As a kid, I received mixed messages about ambition. On the one hand, my parents, like many of their generation were all too familiar with thwarted ambition and encouraged me to follow through on anything I showed an interest in. They didn’t let the constraints they experienced growing up during the war colour their attitude to the opportunities that were open to me. They were very aware though of their place in the social order which led to the mixed messages. Any success for me was always grounded with “We don’t want you getting ideas above your station” and being caught out “blowing your own trumpet” carried deep shame, especially if your trumpet blowing was witnessed publicly. I used to love appearing in the school plays but I could see my parents in the second row switch from heartfelt pride to deep felt embarrassment when the applause started. It wasn’t that big a deal though – far more doors were opened than remained closed.

My first job after leaving school was with Nat West Bank. Goodness knows how I ended up in a bank. Lots of my peers from school found themselves against their better nature in a bank. I think the careers master was on a commission. It was generally accepted that in your first year as a junior bank clerk you were expected to do all the menial jobs in the machine room and when the new cohort started the following year, you could start doing one of the more specialist jobs. This was 1977/78 and there was a strange attitude that there were “men’s jobs” and there were “women’s jobs” and never the twain should meet. I never understood what differentiated one from the other. For example, men were given the standing orders clerk role whilst the women did the opening of new accounts. I was no rebel, just eager to try everything and so pushed back against this odd stereotyping and in my second year had a bash at both the men’s and women’s jobs. One other attitude was just plain offensive. It was 40 years ago but came straight from another century. I worked in the Southall branch and there were several Asian women working there. The manager decided that their real names were too difficult to pronounce and gave them all English names. I’m not kidding. Paramjeet and Anooka became Pam and Annie. I couldn’t do it but it set up several collisions because the women themselves generally accepted the manager’s insult. My time at the bank ended unceremoniously. I came back from my August holiday with my ear pierced. The assistant manager called me into his office and informed me that the customers would be offended by my piercing (it was only a stud). “Let’s face it Mark. For the last two years we’ve been trying to fit your square peg into a round hole”. At the time my great ambition was to be a super cool Mod rather than a super cool standing orders clerk, so we went our separate ways.

From there, I joined the Civil Service, namely the DHSS. Their dress code was astonishingly lax compared to the bank. In 1979, I wouldn’t have been seen dead not wearing my tonic suit and tassle brogues, so still stuck out like a sore thumb for the opposite reasons to Nat West. On my very first day, I encountered the bizarre hierarchical structures that exist within the civil service. There were four of us who started on the same day and we were allocated a bank of desks just inside the door of a huge open plan office. This was to be our home for the 13 weeks of our induction period. We were given a huge pile of manuals that we were expected to work through. Coming back from lunch that first day, I discovered my chair had gone missing. The training manager came out of her room carrying a new chair. She was very apologetic and told me that I’d been allocated the wrong chair that morning – “EOs can have chairs with arms. COs have armless chairs”. Neither me, nor my fellow newcomers had realised we were different grades. They were all EOs (Executive Officers). I was one ring down the ladder – a Clerical Officer and a chair with arms is a chair above my station. There were no men’s and women’s jobs within the DHSS and I was still eager to try everything. I did my six months on the front desk, did six months visiting pensioners in their homes helping them review their claims. It was great fun. I did buy into the hierarchical structure and twice applied unsuccessfully for promotion to a chair with arms. They let me “act up” for 18 months but my eventual rise to permanent EO came about rather oddly. I was having my annual appraisal and my manager announced that he was recommending me for promotion. I asked him what I’d done differently and he told me that he was having his tea break in the rest room whilst I was directing a rehearsal of the staff Christmas show! “You convinced me you have the necessary leadership qualities”. It was the first time I’d heard the word “leadership” mentioned. It was bollocks of course. I wasn’t leading the cast: I just knew how to deliver a funny line.

Next stop career wise was a local authority. If I’d been ambitious, I was in the wrong job. Whereas in the civil service you can move between the DHSS and the Home Office for example, in a local council you can’t even move from housing benefit to town planning within the same council. It’s a very limiting ladder. After three years, I applied and got the job as Training Manager. It was a higher grade and more money but that wasn’t the motivation. I was challenging myself but my instinct was that I would be good at it. And as the DHSS Christmas shows had shown, I do like playing to an audience. I quickly learned that it was a job that really suited me. Being responsible for everyone’s induction training, I realised that I could have a huge influence over how people did their job without the power or responsibility of being a manager. I know that “manager” was in my job title but that said more about the council’s propensity to self importance than it said about what I actually did. This was 1988 and I suppose was the start of what is now endemic within councils – everyone is a manager. As the years passed my role expanded and I was able to run courses on personal and professional development. I even ran several “leadership” courses. The staff liked them: the management less so. Their ideas about leadership were very different to mine.

Nowadays leaders are expected to announce what makes them great leaders to the world. There’s a doctor on Twitter who bursts uninvited to any thread to announce his leadership credentials and why his ways work. I find him very funny but he is deadly serious. You cannot be a 2018 leader if you don’t tell the world what you’re passionate about. No Leader’s Twitter profile is complete without a cacophony of trumpets announcing that you’re passionate about this, that or the other. Back in 1998, the audience for your pompous vanity was much smaller. I recall sitting in check in during my counselling diploma training. The peacocks quickly learn that check in an opportunity to strut your stuff, show you’ve mastered the lingo and score several points at your peer’s expense. On this particular day, one of my peers made this astonishing claim: ” I’ve been processing my process and discovered that I am able to give 100% unconditional positive regard to every person in my life”. In the ensuing silence, you could see everyone else’s unconditional positive regard go for a burton as 29 checkmated counselling students wrestled with the same thought, “Oh for goodness sake. Shut the fuck up”. It’s not enough anymore to have ambitions or to achieve your ambitions. Now you need your achievements and ambitions witnessed and validated by the entire world. My parents would be bewildered.

Ermintrude’s post focused on work and I have followed the same. The older I get though, I find I haven’t changed much at all from that eager junior clerk except that my ambitions and challenges are likely to lie elsewhere other than work. This year, I’ve been fiercely motivated around my weight training. Last week I decided to try and write a farce. The challenge in plotting a farce is enormous and I’m loving every minute of it. I’m often asked to take on writing/speaking/advocacy projects and my criteria for acceptance is very different from how it might have been 25 years ago. Nowadays I’ll take on stuff if it’s going to be good fun and/or I’ll learn something from the experience. That’s my criteria.

And I still have no wish to be a leader. Horses for courses.

Having written this post, I’m not sure how much it’s got to do with Ermintrude’s piece from earlier. I think I’ve just rambled on trying to find reasons why I’ve shied away from being a leader. But I also feel that ambition is in the eye of the beholder and never needs justification. My favourite part of my job is when I get my clients on to their interests and what they can do to make their life more fulfilling. Every response is totally unique and often comes as a surprise to the person who’s mouth the words have just left. Whatever they come up with, it rarely involves climbing up the career ladder.

View story at Medium.com

View story at Medium.com

Collector’s Items

The other day I wrote about Jack Moore and how he’s ended up with a criminal record when the real criminals, Cedar House management, got off Scott free for providing such poor staffing levels they must be breaching the patient’s human rights.

I mentioned Jack’s contribution to the Rightful Lives exhibition and I was looking through his photos again this morning. As I said in the first post, I’m not going to spoil the surprise but basically it’s a series of photos of Jack’s collection of ??? It’s a totally unique collection and Jack has converted his whole bedroom at home to house and display his collection.

It’s got me thinking about the nature of collections and how important they can be in our lives. At Steven’s yesterday, I watched him going through his photo albums. Before he started going through them individually he stood by the shelves and gently stroked the spines of each one. It was like a loving caress. He eventually settled on one that doesn’t include him. It’s the one that has all the black and white photos of my childhood and is populated by relatives that were long gone before Steven arrived. He knows who they all are of course but he has no personal memories of many of the cast. Nevertheless a photo (probably circa 1964) of me and my mum standing outside a sentry booth at Windsor Castle had him purring with contentment. He does the same thing with his CD collection. He pulls up a dining table chair to the CD player and after much deliberation and caressing, takes out a CD. He then can spend up to half an hour looking through the sleeve and may not get round to putting the CD on. The whole performance is accompanied with regular sighs and sounds of deep pleasure.

I am the same. Last night I did a little experiment. My theory is that our collections take us back to a time when our world’s felt safer. The bigger the collection, the bigger the illusory comfort blanket. I went to my collection of Southall FC programmes from the 1970s and in the way a magician says “pick a card, any card”, picked out a random programme. I made a powerful selection. It was a cup game Vs Dulwich Hamlet from the day after my 17th birthday in 1976. Now this wasn’t a safe time in my life at all. Seven weeks earlier my mum had died and at the time felt like the most precarious point of my life. I read the programme cover to cover. The league table with names I’ve long forgotten: Lewes, Epsom & Ewell. The team sheet was always on the back cover and one name set me off into a Steven like purr. Junior Cressford Jones. He had joined the club recently following the sale of Alan Devonshire to West Ham. He could have been as good as Devonshire but he was a belligerent bastard. Always getting sent off or in what was unheard of back in 1976, trying to get others sent off. One slight touch and he’d be rolling around the pitch screaming. It wasn’t a becoming sight. Anyway, there was something about seeing that name and having my entire programme collection around me that made everything right in my world again. I’m still ill and without a diagnosis. I’ve still got the same hang ups that I had before selecting that programme but suddenly, my world felt more manageable again. Perhaps unconsciously I was reminded of the strength I’ve built up since 1976. Who knows. Who cares. It did the trick.

I also think collections represent anchors. And if we don’t have anchors we’re all at sea. I’ve got the entire collection of Agatha Christies on my bookshelf. I haven’t read any of them for years but it’s important to me to know they’re there. Whenever I dust them my mind goes back to the first one I ever brought. It was 1984 on the platform at Reading station enroute to a holiday in Paignton. I nipped into WH Smith’s to find something to read on the train. The publishers had just reissued The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and there was a display of them just inside the door. That particular novel is considered one of the top three books Christie ever wrote, so it was a good introduction to her canon. In the space of three years I’d purchased the entire set. I’m a bit manic when I start collecting a set of something. I’m never entirely happy until the whole set is complete so I go completely overboard and nearly bankrupt myself in a couple of months.

I hardly ever look at my collections. But I like to know they’re there.

Coming full circle back to Jack, I wonder if any of the professionals consider what it must be like to be deprived of your anchors for years at a time. You cannot find new anchors in an ATU, the set up doesn’t lend itself to such valuable things. In fact, when Steven was away, the management we’re proud that they’d removed all his anchors claiming he needed to be broken down as part of the “treatment”. I know that when he came home he immediately put back all the anchors he had before his detention. But it was a long, laborious and painful process for him to trust those anchors again. My fear for Jack is that he has been away from his collection for so long now, it will cease to have the properties it once had. But perhaps I’m undermining Jack. He’s built of very strong stock.

I’ve got a free afternoon today. I’ll phone the hospital for an update after lunch and then I’m going to work my way through my collection of Just A Minute CDs.

And I can promise in advance, whatever the outcome of the phone call,  that I will purr like a good ”un when I hear Kenneth Williams complain to Nicholas Parsons, “I’ve come all the way from Great Portland Street”.

“You’re Not On The ERS System”

The year that Steven was in the ATU, I had a really good commentary dream. It helped me enormously throughout the year make some sort of sense of the hideous system. In the dream, I was in the audience watching a grotesque Shakespearian parody. All the actors are standing on slightly raised circular platforms that are spinning dangerously out of control. As the platforms speed up, the actors become madder and madder but for some reason they can’t get off. I go under the stage to investigate and there are a series of badly designed and even more badly connected huge Heath Robinson like machines. I’m no engineer but even I can see that it is the poor design and faulty connections that is causing the serious system malfunction. One thing is for sure, I know that whatever I do, I must not get on the stage.

Yesterday morning I decided to chase up my hospital appointment. I haven’t heard anything and it is seven days since my GP told me he was doing an urgent referral. I phoned the hospital first but they knew nothing about me. They told me to phone the GP and get more information about the referral. I did and was given the email address the referral was sent to. They also gave me a 25 digit booking reference number. I phoned the hospital back and the woman said, “Ah. That’s why you haven’t heard anything. They didn’t send it via the ERS system”. “What does that mean?” I asked. “That email wouldn’t even be looked at. We’re a paperless system now. All referrals must be made via the ERS system”. I wanted to scream at her – “I don’t care whether it’s an ERS or a STFU system. I just want to know whether I’m dying of cancer”. After an hour of me having to go backwards and forwards between the surgery and the hospital it eventually got sorted and I’m waiting for a phone call today with an appointment for a CT scan. It’s as stark as that. My life and/or death coming secondary to computer systems that can’t talk to each other.

Let’s face it. This stuff is endemic now and we waste enormous amounts of energy trying to navigate the malfunctioning machine. Accept a Personal Budget and you automatically become an employer and have to deal with HMRC. In five years, I’ve never once spoken automatically to the person I need to speak to. Phone the generic number for the employer’s helpline and you land in a call centre in Scotland. It’s undoubtedly been outsourced to a Capita, or an Artist, or a Blowjobsforthehedgefundmanagers sort of set up. I’ve not spoken to one person on the helpline that know the Dedicated Carers team exists. Worse, they infer you’re making it up. I guess that passing a call on to another team damages their performance targets. This Kafkaesque dance is replicated to a T if you ever need to contact the Department of Work and Pensions. A few months back I had to phone the council to sort out a mix up between Steven’s updated care assessment and his direct payments. Complete stalemate because two systems, albeit both connected to social care, couldn’t communicate with each other. And I knew for a fact that the two officers I was talking to sit about 100 yards apart in the open plan Civic Centre offices.

One last example. Yesterday Sara Ryan tweeted the latest social care whizzy idea that everyone needing services gets a “named social worker”. Have we become so trapped on the spinning platforms that is considered a great innovation? 10, or 15 years ago, everyone needing social care had a social worker you saw fairly regularly. You were part of their caseload. Now, in these days of duty teams and hot desking, a one to one relationship is considered revolutionary. It’s complete cosmetic bollocks, designed to make you grateful that you’re getting something special. Out of the ordinary.

Since I fell ill, I’ve been toying with the idea of writing something different. I’m a bit weary of mining my life for material. I fancy a bit more privacy. I’ve played with the idea of a whodunnit and even have a plot I quite like. Whatever I write, it will be set in area that I’m familiar with. Last night, I fell into a YouTube wormhole and found a clip of John Cleese discussing farce. I’ve always loved the manic nature of a good farce. I like how it can make the audience fall about laughing whilst feeling deeply uncomfortable at the same time. Cleese was talking about The Anniversary episode of Fawlty Towers. It’s my favourite episode and in my opinion is sublime farce. It’s the one where Sybil goes off in a huff just before some friends are due to arrive for a surprise party. Basil, being Basil, starts with the lie that Sybil is upstairs ill in bed and the farce builds as he cannot back down from that lie. By the end, the farce is so perilous that even the normally unflappable, feet on the ground Polly punches one of the guests in desperation. It’s a work of genius and as Cleese explains, all farce starts with a lie and builds because the protagonist believes they have to defend that lie at all costs.

Social care and all our malfunctioning systems are ripe ground for farce. A dirty great black Joe Orton of a farce.

I’m on to it. I wonder if they’ll let me take a notebook and pen into the CT scan with me?

Standing With Jack

I’ve never met Jack Moore but, by golly, I love that guy. I first heard about Jack during last year’s 7 Days of Action campaign and my admiration for him grows with every story I hear about this stoic young man. In a few week’s time you’ll all see Jack’s contribution to the Rightful Lives online exhibition. I’m not going to give the game away but when you see his exhibit, it’ll break your heart and have you doing fist pumps simultaneously. He’s a truly wonderful chap.

This morning the press reported on a court case Jack was involved in last week. I suggest you read the report before proceeding with this post:

https://www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/autistic-patient-punched-staff-nurse-1865703.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Cedar House again. That hellhole where you can go for six months assessment and be imprisoned for 10 years. The same place where Jason died last year after swallowing batteries which Cedar House tried to pass off as “natural causes”. Here is my post about Jason’s death:

https://markneary1dotcom1.wordpress.com/2018/05/29/jason/

I don’t know what evidence was presented in court to arrive at Jack’s guilty verdict but I think some context is important that was missing from the newspaper report.

Jack and Jason were mates. They had shared time on the same wards and had discovered things in common. In a move that reeks of Southern Health banning baths for all residents after Connor Sparrowhawk’s death, Cedar House’s immediate response to Jason’s death was to remove all patient’s possessions that used batteries. I learned a couple of weeks ago that they confiscated a patient’s hearing aid for several weeks because it was run by a battery. Jack’s MP3 player is very important to him. He loves music and it also proves to be extremely useful when Jack is feeling agitated as a way of calming him down. But no, it needed a battery so was taken off him just a short while after his friend had  died in the most appalling manner. I’m pretty sure that it is the MP3 player that is indirectly referred to in the newspaper report but its importance isn’t emphasised.

The ward was clearly in chaos. It was in “lockdown”. I’d consider that unsurprising when all the patients had seen their valuable, coping possessions removed. But without the background, it’s easy to assume that it’s those complex needs non humans running havoc.

The report also includes very differing statements about the staffing levels on the wards. In her victim statement, the member of staff who was hit doesn’t mention Jack at all but devotes her attention to the dangerously low staffing levels. And from her statement it’s clear that this wasn’t a one off on that particular day but a regular, repeated pattern across the company. The management, in their statement, diss the victim statement and insist there was a full staff compliment. I know who I believe. I’ve heard from two other people with insider knowledge of Cedar House and extremely low staff levels are a common occurrence.

Why doesn’t anyone join the dots? The CQC? The commissioners who are sending people to their doom? NHS England? There are mountains of evidence that Cedar House is an unsafe, dangerous place whose main motivation is the £8k they receive each week for each patient.

One last thing and I was almost tempted not to mention it because it has become so commonplace – the report plunges into that deeply offensive void again – the difficult world of learning disabilities. Jack’s “complex needs” are used as the trump card to get Cedar House off the hook. It doesn’t matter that it’s a specialist service. It doesn’t matter that it boasts a staff team, trained and qualified to deal with anything. It doesn’t matter that they earn an absolute fortune every week for their “expertise”. None of that even matters when you want to turn one of your patients into the villian of the piece; the agent of his own downfall. It stinks.

It’s become a common mantra during the inquests of Danny Tozer and Richard Handley. It came up during the GMC hearing of Dr Valerie Murphy, the responsible clinician for Connor Sparrowhawk.

He died? Yes, but he did have complex needs. Oh, that’s okay then.

His records show he is subject to prone restraint on a daily basis? Yes, but he’s got extremely complex needs. Oh, that’s okay then.

Cedar House will continue to grow and grow. The shareholders need their dividends so our sons and daughters will continue to be fed into its machine.

Hang in there Jack. You’ve got a lot of life to catch up on. But you will. You’ve got too much spirit not to.